[返回杂论闲侃首页]·[所有跟帖]·[ 回复本帖 ] ·[热门原创] ·[繁體閱讀]·[版主管理]
Hong Kong government denounces 'biased reporting' by the Economist
送交者: Sak1tama[布衣] 于 2024-03-11 23:29 已读 4246 次  

Sak1tama的个人频道



HONG KONG, Jan 12 (Reuters) - The Hong Kong government has criticised the Economist magazine over an article about the city's recent Legislative Council election, saying it is "appalled by the biased reporting" and "baseless accusation that the polls were rigged".

Candidates in the Dec. 19 city assembly election were vetted so only "patriots" could stand. Pro-Beijing candidates swept to victory though turnout was a record low for a vote that came some 18 months after Beijing cracked down on a pro-democracy movement in the city with a new national security law.

Critics described the election as undemocratic but authorities in the former British colony have repeatedly said it was "conducted in an open, fair and honest manner".

Hong Kong's second most senior official, John Lee, denounced what he said was a serious but baseless accusation by the Economist that the poll was rigged.

"If anything was 'rigged', it was the deliberately distorted image of Hong Kong that has been manipulated from the dark side of one's personal internal bias," Lee said in a letter dated Jan. 11 and posted on a city government website.

The Economist did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The British magazine published an editorial on Jan. 8 headlined "Pliant patriots" with a subheadline that said "Hong Kong's new legislature has been sworn in. It is a mockery of democracy".

Beijing imposed the national security in mid-2020 after months of at times violent pro-democracy protests.

Since then, more than 150 democracy activists, newspaper editors and journalists have been arrested and the clampdown on one of Asia's most vibrant media hubs has sent a chill through the global financial centre.

Critics of the legislation say it is being used to crush dissent but Hong Kong and Beijing authorities reject that.

Hong Kong authorities also deny targeting the media.

Authorities have also criticised recent commentaries by the Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg regarding the election.

In November, the Economist said Hong Kong had declined to renew the visa of one of its journalists and urged the city to maintain foreign media access.

The government and immigration department said at the time they could not comment on individual cases.

When Hong Kong returned to Chinese rule in 1997, it was with the promise that wide-ranging individual rights, including a free press, would be protected. Pro-democracy activists and rights groups say freedoms have been eroded, in particular since Beijing imposed the national security law. 6park.com

https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/hong-kong-government-denounces-biased-reporting-by-economist-2022-01-12/
喜欢Sak1tama朋友的这个贴子的话, 请点这里投票,“赞”助支持!
[举报反馈]·[ Sak1tama的个人频道 ]·[-->>参与评论回复]·[用户前期主贴]·[手机扫描浏览分享]·[返回杂论闲侃首页]
帖子内容是网友自行贴上分享,如果您认为其中内容违规或者侵犯了您的权益,请与我们联系,我们核实后会第一时间删除。

所有跟帖:        ( 主贴楼主有权删除不文明回复,拉黑不受欢迎的用户 )


    用户名:密码:[--注册ID--]

    标 题:

    粗体 斜体 下划线 居中 插入图片插入图片 插入Flash插入Flash动画


         图片上传  Youtube代码器  预览辅助

    打开微信,扫一扫[Scan QR Code]
    进入内容页点击屏幕右上分享按钮

    楼主本栏目热帖推荐:

    >>>>查看更多楼主社区动态...






    [ 留园条例 ] [ 广告服务 ] [ 联系我们 ] [ 个人帐户 ] [ 版主申请 ] [ Contact us ]