[返回军事纵横首页]·[所有跟帖]·[ 回复本帖 ] ·[热门原创] ·[繁體閱讀]·[版主管理]
只用300个人,就把人类起源的假说否定了,猴子理论吗?
送交者: 甲骨[★★声望品衔9★★] 于 2024-04-02 19:58 已读 1339 次 1 赞  

甲骨的个人频道

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/a-new-study-has-changed-the-birthplace-of-humanity/ar-AA1bxabO 6park.com

A New Study Has Changed the Birthplace of Humanity 6park.com

简言之,过去的非洲起源理论不对,和事实不符,所以又搞了一个新的,多地起源理论,但还限于非洲(什么道理?) 6park.com

这个新的"理论",当然也是胡扯的成分多,看着就是乱编一气。但是反过来说明,过去的"理论",是由多么的不靠谱。 6park.com

“Decades of study of human genome variation have suggested a predominantly tree-like model of recent population divergence from a single ancestral population in Africa,” the study says. “It has been difficult to reconcile this finding with the fossil and archaeological records of human occupation across the vast African continent.” 6park.com

To reach their conclusion, the researchers investigated the genomes of nearly 300 people across a variety of ancestral backgrounds and—even going back a million years—still weren’t able to lock in on just one distinct population set. Instead, their findings suggested that there must be at least two populations, which they dub Stem1 and Stem2. 6park.com

“We cannot rule out the possibility that more complex models involving additional stems, more complex population structure, or hybrid models including both weak structure and archaic hominin admixture, may better explain the data,” the study says.

贴主:甲骨于2024_04_02 19:58:48编辑
喜欢甲骨朋友的这个贴子的话, 请点这里投票,“赞”助支持!
[举报反馈]·[ 甲骨的个人频道 ]·[-->>参与评论回复]·[用户前期主贴]·[手机扫描浏览分享]·[返回军事纵横首页]
帖子内容是网友自行贴上分享,如果您认为其中内容违规或者侵犯了您的权益,请与我们联系,我们核实后会第一时间删除。

所有跟帖:        ( 主贴楼主有权删除不文明回复,拉黑不受欢迎的用户 )


用户名:密码:[--注册ID--]

标 题:

粗体 斜体 下划线 居中 插入图片插入图片 插入Flash插入Flash动画


     图片上传  Youtube代码器  预览辅助

打开微信,扫一扫[Scan QR Code]
进入内容页点击屏幕右上分享按钮

楼主本栏目热帖推荐:

>>>>查看更多楼主社区动态...






[ 留园条例 ] [ 广告服务 ] [ 联系我们 ] [ 个人帐户 ] [ 版主申请 ] [ Contact us ]